User:Articles0405/Typhus/DianaDuran36 Peer Review

Most of your sources come from the CDC which is a good start but having other articles to cite from would be nice. The writing has really good structure and formatting but the tone seems more casual than academic. (Since Wiki is meant to be an online encyclopedia I assume they would want more academic-sounding additions.) Although, overall you have a really good base to work from. The addition of subsections felt necessary for the development of the article. Best of luck on rest of your article!

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)