User:Artylearner/Monument Lab/Tuh20608 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Artylearner


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Monument Lab Monument Lab


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Monument Lab

Evaluate the drafted changes
The first draft of this article is well written. I did some small edits for the grammar, but nothing major. The Lead has a nice flow to it, it's short and to the point and doesn't have any bias. There could be more about the "Projects", but that will come with time. There could also be more about the history of organization, the monument lab with iconoclasm etc. I would also be wary of references you are using, I feel like it's always safest to go with articles that can be found in Temple Libraries, but if you can't, and the websites you are using are reputable then you should be good. I just don't want to see your hard work go to waste.