User:Arushilahiri/China-India Relations/Keerthikonda Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Arushilahiri


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Arushilahiri/China-India Relations


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * China-India Relations

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? It looks like another article for the Look-East Policy is linked under See-also so it might not be completely necessary to add a sub-section for that in this China-India Relations article as well. Other than that, everything else seems pretty relevant. I also don't think its necessary to go over debates by Echeverri-Gent, etc. or criticisms of Modi initiatives or economic agendain this article. In this instance, it might be beneficial to limit additions to further expanding on what is already briefly mentioned in the article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - Yes the articles you've added into the article under References are fairly new with a lot in 2023.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? - For the most part, the added content seems neutral, but in sentences like "Unfortunately, though well-intentioned in desire to stop cheap goods from decimating local businesses, scholars explain that Modi had taken nationalism to a new extreme, translating what once was “Make in India” to effectively “Protect in India” by implementing 370 anti-dumping suits, 220 of which relate to Chinese goods . Though nationalism’s efficacy may be debatable, the far end of the spectrum, protectionism, is widely acknowledged as a severe deterrent to capital freedom and internal market levels .", sentence structure could be changed slightly to keep the tone more neutral and clear for the purposes of Wikipedia.

Sources and References


 * I s all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Yes all the new content that was added is followed by a citation to a reliable secondary scholarly source of information.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes it easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - No I don't see any grammatical or spelling errors.

Overall impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?/How can the content added be improved? - I think you have included a lot of really useful information in your additions, but you might be able to simplify it further for clarity.

-Keerthi :)