User:Aryaft1/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Born-digital

I updated the article I'm evaluating to Digital will

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because this is a topic that is relevant to the course. I am new to archives and I want to learn more about born-digital records. The article does a good job defining what born-digital records are and providing examples.

I updated to the Digital will article because I could make more improvements than the first article I chose.

Evaluate the article
The lead section clearly defines the topic but does not provide a concise overview of the articles major sections. The lead mentions digital reformatting which is not present in subsequent sections. The lead is concise.

The article’s content is relevant to the topic and the content is up-to-date. There is a section on Media which does not have any content. The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia’s equity gaps or topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

The article has a neutral tone. It’s main purpose is to define and describe digital born items.

The facts are backed up by reliable secondary sources. There is a wide variety of relevant and current sources. There were a few articles from journals but when I clicked on the links I was unable to access them. It would be great to see more peer-reviewed articles included if possible.

The article is well-organized and easy to read and is free from grammatical or spelling errors.

The article includes relevant and well described images. The images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. The images are public domain or own work.

This article was a part of a course assignment. There have been a few talks regarding external link edits.

The Digital will article needs improvement in the lead section. The article needs to provide a better definition for digital wills.

The articles content is relevant to the topic but needs more information.

The article has a neutral tone.

There needs to be more resources added to the article.

The article has no images.