User:Asalvio/Nerita picea/TP0041 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing Asalvio's work


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Asalvio/Nerita picea
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nerita picea

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is great. It follow's Wikipedia's advice of it being able to be read on its own. The information added to the lead is thoughtful. All of the content is relevant to their respective sections. All of the content is neutral. The information is easy to read and organized nicely. The content added makes the article more complete. For the Description section, I would like to read more about their morphology and reproduction if that information is available. For the Human Use section, do you know if there are fisheries for this species? Are there any regulations for catching them? Are people able to just go to the coast and easily catch them? Overall, your first draft is excellent.

'''Thank you for your peer review! I will definitely add morphology and reproduction if I find it. Also I’ll look into fisheries. Thank you you feedback was very helpful!'''