User:Asassdaw/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
2018 FIFA World Cup

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Personally, I am a soccer fan, as the World Cup 2022 is approaching, it seems reasonable for me tor review the last World Cup that took place in 2018, serve as a warm-up for the upcoming World Cup.

Evaluate the article
The Leading Section:

The first sentence of this article is: "The 2018 FIFA World Cup was an international football tournament contested by men's national teams that took place between 14 June and 15 July 2018 in Russia", this provides a clear definition of the 2018 FIFA World Cup. In the section, it also summarized the key details such as the champions, the participating members etc. That ensure the readers who only want to scale briefly will be able to do so, it doesn't have any irrelevant information and doesn't provide too much details.

Content:

The content of this article is board, it covers anything that I can think of regarding to the World Cup 2018, includes its process, the result of each match, the venue, statistics regarding to business, even some related controversies. The sources are up to date, majority of them are gathered from the FIFA official websites and documents, and some of the outside source are also drawn from the professional sports websites, therefore, the article covers enough range of topics about the World Cup 2018 with enough accuracy.

Tone and Balance:

This article is very neutral in essence, given that its content are objective facts. The entire article doesn't have much opinion involved. There are no rooms for the writer's opinion to exists whatsoever.

Source and Reference:

As mentioned in the content part, basically all of the content that related to the World Cup 2018 includes the final result, the score, the venue, the budget, participating team etc. which have been mentioned in the article is drawn from the FIFA official websites, this ensure that it is accurate and it is up to date. This cover majority of the sources for this article. For some other sources, I clicked on some random links and it all worked. I will also add that all those websites are reliable enough and I don't think there is need for alternative one.

Origination and Writing Quality:

The writing quality of this article is adequate, it is very easy tor read and understand, the sentence seems very concise and doesn't feel wordy. Also, the article is well-structured. It generally follow a chronological order, starting from qualification match, to the group draw, group match, knock-out match and the final. After that, it shows some statistics of the match, followed by some business side facts such as the income from the tickets and board casting fess. Overall, it felt very neatly organized.

Images and Media:

The images presented in this article is highly relevant and it is usually placed on the side of the correspond context, which improve the reading experience, also enhances audience's understanding of the context. All the images have detailed information about its source.

Talk Page Discussion:

There aren't many discussion involved, I would presume that it is because most of the content are facts and it has a strong sources are easily identify online, which means it is less likely to make mistakes. The discussion mainly focus on the the final standing of the article.

Overall Impression:

I would say that it is a strong articles with abundant and accurate content with a good structure, all of the information is up to date. The status for this article should be consider as completed. The thing I maybe would do to improve is to add more images such as goal celebration and player's images.