User:Asegura01/Rasquachismo/Mistymitz Peer Review

General info
Asegura01
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Asegura01/Rasquachismo:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Rasquachismo:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The lead highlights the background of Rasquachismo. The current version of the article highlights Rasquachismo as a term and it's artistic context with some history. Asegura01's edit begins starts to create more organization in the article.

Content
Based on my understandings of raquachismo the content in the article is relevant. The edits done from Asegura01 also go more into depth about the whole art movment. It is a bit unclear as to how many artist or which artists besides the ones listed fall into the category of raquachismo. I would suggest to add a section of realated topics or suggested articles.

The content also seems to be up to date based on the links used as well.

Tone and Balance
Overal, the article had a good flow of keeping a neutral tone. In addition, it doea a good job making sure the reader is well informated and not persuaded to think a certain matter.

Based on the current status of the article, it is missing some parts that can help maintain the netrual tone of the article because some parts are missing like other artists or how it is seen geographically.

Sources and Refences
The sources are credible and are refrenced throughout the aricle. They are also nicely listed at the bottom of the aricle.

Organization
The aricle is consise, well written, and well organized. There are some sections missing but this is understandable because it is a work in progress. I would say to keep the Terms section from the orignal article.

Images and Media
The images enhance the article and give me a better sense of what the aricle is about. The images are well camptioned and also sourced.

Overall Impressions
The aricle was well written and had a good amount of resources and images. These suggestions add to the article but I would make sure to keep some parts of the orignal article like the terms and possibly quotes.