User:Ash.cobbler/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Antivenom

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Since this course is about toxicants I wanted to find a toxicology related article. I ended up choosing this antivenom article because I think it is an important part of toxicology as it shows was to combat toxicants if exposed. Given the importance of something like antivenom, I think evaluating this article to ensure the information it carries holds weight is highly important for public health.

Evaluate the article
I think this article is strong. It has a good up to date information, as it was last updated August 24th of this year. The lead of the article is very informative and provides a strong sense as to what's to come in the rest of the article. This article aims to inform which is paralleled with its unbiased tone. All of the source links work, and they provide relevant information, a desired quality of an article like this; the only caviat is there is a place where a claim is made and the accredited source said "citation needed" which needs to be addressed. The layout of the article is clear, and easy to follow. There is lots of relevant information including the history of the discovery of antivenom and the process by which antivenoms are manufactured. The included tables provide lists of known toxic species and the related antivenom for each, if applicable which is a very good resource to have out on the internet for general public health. After looking at the talk page for this article, there are not major contradictions or discrepancies with this article which is important and speaks volumes about the information contained within. Overall I think this is a very good article to use as a resource if needed.