User:Ash the dragonfly/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Road Ecology
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead section
 * The lead section was good, it defined the topic in detail and provide a very concise overview.
 * It described the topic of the article clearly with relevant information.
 * Content
 * The content of the article was relevant.
 * The content of the article was not up to date. The information came from articles that were not recent.
 * There is content missing and it needs to be updated using recent articles.
 * This article deals with one of the Wiki equity gaps and it is definitely related to underrepresented populations.
 * Tone and balance
 * The article had sufficient information.
 * There were no claims that were biased.
 * Sources and Reference:
 * The facts were based on reliable sources.
 * The sources were thorough.
 * The sources were not current.
 * It was not written by a diverse spectrum of authors.
 * There are better sources available to add to this topic.
 * Some links are not working.
 * Organization and writing quality
 * The article was concise but well-written.
 * There are some grammatical errors.
 * The article was broken down into sections.
 * Images and media
 * There are some images but it needs to be updated in relation to the information.
 * The images were correctly cited.
 * Talk Page discussion
 * There was a discussion on how the article is overlapping and there are empty sections.
 * The article was rated as a C-Class (low importance).
 * Overall Impressions
 * The article had strengths that can be developed by including how different urban cities contribute to landscape ecology.
 * The article can be improved in many ways by including more information, images, and edits.
 * This article is somewhat developed.
 * Sources
 * https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/road-ecology
 * https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281379243_The_ecology_of_roads_in_urban_and_urbanising_landscapes
 * https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/62/1/100/294989
 * https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/road-ecology
 * https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281379243_The_ecology_of_roads_in_urban_and_urbanising_landscapes
 * https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/62/1/100/294989

Option 2

 * Subtropical climate vegetated roof
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead section
 * The lead section was well written it briefly defined the topic and provide a good overview.
 * It describes the topic of the article clearly with relevant information.
 * Content
 * The content of the article was relevant.
 * The content of the article was up to date. The information came from articles that were recent.
 * There is important content missing.
 * This article deals with one of the Wiki equity gaps and it is definitely related to underrepresented populations.
 * Tone and balance
 * The article was neutral.
 * Some viewpoints were overrepresented.
 * The article was more of an informational article.
 * Sources and Reference:
 * The sources were not thorough.
 * The sources were current
 * It was not written by a diverse spectrum of authors.
 * There are better sources available to add to this topic.
 * The links are working.
 * Organization and writing quality
 * The article was written somewhat poorly with brief information
 * There are some grammatical errors.
 * The article was broken down into sections with not a lot of information
 * Images and media
 * There was no image.
 * Talk Page discussion
 * There was one discussion in this article.
 * The article was rated as a start-class article with low importance.
 * Overall Impressions
 * The article had strengths that could be developed.
 * The article can be improved in many ways by including more information, images, and edits relating urban environment.
 * This article is underdeveloped and it could prove important.
 * Sources
 * https://bantam.earth/freshwater-aquarium-plants/
 * https://www.petmd.com/fish/care/5-live-aquarium-plants-even-beginner-can-care
 * https://modestfish.com/best-beginner-aquarium-plants/
 * Sources
 * https://bantam.earth/freshwater-aquarium-plants/
 * https://www.petmd.com/fish/care/5-live-aquarium-plants-even-beginner-can-care
 * https://modestfish.com/best-beginner-aquarium-plants/

Option 3

 * Landscape genomics
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead section
 * The lead section was good, it briefly defined the topic with relevant information.
 * Content
 * The content of the article was relevant.
 * The content of the article was not up to date. The information came from articles that were not recent.
 * There is insufficient content
 * This article deals with one of the Wiki equity gaps and it is definitely related to underrepresented populations.
 * Tone and balance
 * The article is from a neutral point of view.
 * The viewpoints were not underrepresented.
 * There were no claims that were biased.
 * Sources and Reference:
 * The facts were based on reliable secondary sources.
 * The sources were not thorough.
 * The sources were not current
 * It was not written by a diverse spectrum of authors.
 * There are sources available to add to this topic.
 * The links are working.
 * Organization and writing quality
 * The article was concise but well-written which makes it easy to read and understand.
 * There are some grammatical errors.
 * The article was broken down into the proper sections.
 * Images and media
 * There were no images that related to the topic at hand.
 * Talk Page discussion
 * There was no discussion.
 * The article was rated as a sub-class article.
 * Overall Impressions
 * The article has potential strengths which need to be developed.
 * The article can be improved in many ways by including more information, images, and edits.
 * This article is properly developed but it can be improved with more recent information.
 * The article can be improved in many ways by including more information, images, and edits.
 * This article is properly developed but it can be improved with more recent information.


 * Sources
 * https://academic.oup.com/jhered/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jhered/esac020/6565646