User:Ash the dragonfly/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Women in climate change)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Climate change is a stressor which is affecting our world. Everyone is concerned about climate change, but from a lot of people points of view it seems like it is a problem for the future generation and they ask themselves, 'does it concern me?, it is my issue to deal with this?' It does not matter who you are, climate change is affecting out world. I chose this topic because I was curious about if women are taking a stand and making a different in the world. My preliminery impression was bounded by surprised because I didn't know that women make such great impact in climate change. )

Evaluate the article
Lead Section


 * The lead section included an introductory sentence which describes the article concisely and clearly.
 * The lead section included a description of the article major sections
 * The lead was concise.

Content


 * The article content area was relevant to the topic.
 * The contents are not up to date with recent information.
 * There a lot of content missing (some of the content was just "touch on")
 * This article only concisely deal with wikipedias equity gaps. It does not address the underrepresented population or topics.

Tone


 * The article is from a neutral point of view. It spoke about women in a neutral tone.
 * The claims does not appear biased.
 * The view points are underrepresented.

Sources and References


 * The facts that were listed were backed by a reliable secondary source.
 * Most of the sources are thorough
 * The sources are current.
 * The sources are not written by a diverse spectrum of authors.
 * There are better sources which discussed the women in climate change better.
 * The links worked.

Organisation and Writing Quality


 * The article was easy to read with sparse, concise information.
 * There were grammatical errors in the article.
 * The article was broken down to the relevant points that was given.

Images and Media


 * The article included sparse images which did not enhance the topic.
 * The few mages are captioned correctly
 * The images in the article adhere to the regulations on wiki.
 * The images were laid out in a somewhat appealing way.

Talk page discussion


 * The article was rated B- Class with a total of 346 edits. There are a lot of missing information.

Overall Impressions

The article over all status in my opinion is a B, it needs a lot of work because there are a lot of incomplete content which isn't enough for a researcher. The article strengths is that it has the information but not enough. The information that was given was important but it was only introduced. This article is underdeveloped and need immense work.