User:Ashack17/Neuroscience and sexual orientation/Kaybraidi Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ashack17


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ashack17/Neuroscience and sexual orientation
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Neuroscience and sexual orientation

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The edit was was significantly more elaborate than the original content. I liked that you incorporate links to the varying related articles that was not present in the original content. Compared to the original, the new content also has provided many sources that are both relevant to the topics and scholarly in nature in order to ensure accuracy of the information being presented. The content organization is easy to follow and relates very well to the original topic in elaborating on the neuroscience component of sexual orientation. The content is also written in an academic fashion without any personal bias evident.