User:Ashah518/Ali Qapu/TiaIvy Peer Review

It looks like the lead section of this article is a bit too long; it should be more concise, no more than one paragraph. It should be a short summary of what’s already covered in the article instead of introducing new information.

Citations need to be added for sentences such as: “Ali Qapu is regarded as the best example of Safavid architecture and a symbol of Iran’s Islamic heritage.”

The third paragraph of the lead section does not flow well. I suggest writing about the wall paintings and the restoration process in separate paragraphs or subsections.

For the part where it talks about how the picture of the building is printed on Iranian money, I suggest giving it a specific section such as Significance.

I particularly liked the inclusion of the different stages of construction.

Overall, the article is very detailed and contains a lot of good information. I would just recommend making sure that all the sources are cited, paragraphs are categorized into subsections, and ensuring the article flows well.