User:Ashleyalfaro/Riot grrrl/Ashk310 Peer Review

General info
Ashleyalfaro
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Riot grrrl
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Riot grrrl

Evaluate the drafted changes
As reading the article and the contributions added I believe that everything flowed smoothly. Everything mentioned in the article from the beginning of what riot girl was, the origins of it, how it started, and the different bands all were relevant and related topics to the article. However, I feel that the section of the Pacific Northwest and Washington, D.C went off on a tangent. That section could be edited to be shorter or to get straight to the point. To answer the question of the article being neutral is that it cant really be since the subject itself is not neutral. It is heavily biased in favor of feminism and relates to women instead of other genders that people may refer themselves as. There are many viewpoints that are overrepresented; the article is very repetitive in that sense. Some of the link to the sources need to be reviewed as well. Regarding to anything missing that should be added: More recent research on the movement can be added and if it is still alive/ how it is going. Other than that the article is solid and the edits made were a great addition!