User:Ashleyrv2018/CSI Effect/Dc10732 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Ashleyrv2018)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ashleyrv2018/CSI_Effect?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * CSI effect

Evaluate the drafted changes
In reference to the article's body all of the content that was added was relevant to the topic. To add, the content was all up to date and did not seem to have any missing content. When discussing the tone and balance all of the content provided in the body was neutral and does not persuade the reader into forming an opinion regarding the topic. Furthermore, there are no viewpoints that seem to be overrepresented or underrepresented.

In regards to your sources and references, all new content that was used was backed up by a reliable secondary sources. The content that was added accurately reflects what the cited sources said and are current sources. Moreover, the sources that was used were the best sources available for this topic since it is relatively new. Also, the links that were provided works

The organization of this article was exceptional. More specifically it was concise, clear, and easy to read. There are no visible grammatical or spelling errors. To continue on, the content was well organized and broken into various subheadings that made it easy to follow and reflected the major points of the topic. Lastly, there was no images or media that could of been added that would of been relevant to this topic.

Overall, these draft changes were well done and I have no major critiques regarding these article edits. Moreover, continue the good work and add to different sections.