User:Ashlyn Ash/sandbox

Evaluation Content
The Wiki page for Hagia Sophia is well done overall. From what I gathered, the information was relevant, as well as the photos. Individuals who edited the page added relevant and interesting objects and information related to the building. There does not seem to be anything important missing from my knowledge of the church, however, i'm sure there are more objects or individual elements to the building that could be discussed further. There also lacks a current photo of the interior of Hagia Sophia, showing the lack of icons, the relative scale, and the elements brought in by the Ottomans.

Evaluating Tone
This particular Wiki page does not seem to have a particular stance on the church, instead, the information is primarily factual in nature. From my knowledge of the church so far, no particular part of the church seems to be underrepresented, however, some information might be able to become expanded upon.

Evaluating Sources
Most of the resources used for this Wiki page are from books, but I checked a few websites that were listed. Most that I checked appeared fairly credible by my judgement, however, one that I checked appeared dubious, but could be argued as credible in the context it was used in.

Checking the Talk Page
A variety of discussions appeared on the talk page of Hagia Sophia, the most recent dating to 2015. This page is rated as C class by nine Wikiprojects including Wikiproject Greece, Religion, and Christianity. In class we discussed Hagia Sophia in context to what was going on during that time period, as well as a few architectural elements built originally or added to the church. The Wiki page for Hagia Sophia is similar to how we discussed in class, only with additional information about objects relating to the building etc.

Article 1:

 * Carta Monastery - The content of the article is relevant but can be expanded upon with more research. The page is written neutrally and each claim appears to have a citation (all of which seem reliable) I would love to expand upon the lore behind this Monastery as well as architectural features. This is my first choice.

Article 2:

 * Abbey of the Dormition - This article's content is relevant to the building, however, little is said about the actual building itself. The page appears neutral, but like Hagia Sophia, religious controversy is relevant for this Abbey. I found this building to be strikingly beautiful and am interested in the fact that it was built in the Byzantine era. Art pieces in the interior could be expanded upon. This would be my second choice.

Article 3:

 * Canons Ashby Priory - The only information for this Priory (Like an Abbey it is run by a prior or a prioress - the superior ranking under an abbot of a monastery) is a very brief history. Without much information on the article, there is no controversy and the information listed is relevant. The citations are also reliable for the information that is there. I found this Priory to be interesting from an artistic architectural standpoint. I wouldn't mind learning more about this building and its art.

Article 4:

 * Dryanovo Monastery - This article has even less information on it than Ashby but I found the interior art to be compelling. I wouldn't mind exploring this - but maybe not for this assignment.