User:AshyCatInc./Evaluate an Article

Avatar: The Last Airbender
(Provide a link to the article here.)

== I was curious on how professional a Wiki can get when researching a very popular children's animation, without adding any opinions. It matters to me because I wanted to learn how to right about something that I enjoy without being bias or opinionated, so I needed an example of that. ==

(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

== The lead section is a well typed summary and background intro, describing the creation of the show and the setting, listing the main characters, naming the success received (awards), and all the media published and is upcoming for the franchise without being overloaded. The content is relevant and up-to-date, referencing the release of the Netflix original coming soon with no missing information regarding anything related to the show, itself. There is no persuasion or bias in this article, only a consistent flow of information, except there is a statement that might need a few sources to back it up; "A number of critics have referred to Avatar as one of the greatest animated television series of all time." Though, with the information given, there's no doubt that many critics have that opinion, it might be better off with some sources to a critic's review. The article is organized by sections based on what the relation is to the show, like ratings, related medias, influence and themes, and episodes. There is no grammatical errors and it is easy to read and follow. There are very little images in this article, which I think could have been useful for presenting what the characters look like, but there are separate Wikis for that, so I don't think it affects this one that much. This is primarily about the show, itself, so it passes. The Avatar: The Last Airbender Wiki has been published and edited since 2005, so there is very little for improvement unless something new comes up. The last edit was on January 21st, 2021, so there are some still in the process of keeping it up-to-date. I think this is a well organized article. ==

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)