User:Asmith2389/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Paula Johnson

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article was assigned to my group in my CS115 class at Wellesley. We are looking at this one because it falls within the guidelines of good pages to evaluate, and has a personal connection to us as the subject is the president of our college. My first impression was a good one, I wish there had been a picture attached, but otherwise it was interesting information to read, and contained a lot of relevant details.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

We had a very positive evaluation of this article, it has relevant information and a great layout. It goes a bit beyond concision, there are some details and content that is more than basic summary, but it enhances the page and is relevant.

Lead section: This section was well written and informative. It had a lot of great details, and some strong highlights of career, and important life details. Content: The content for this article was great! It was well sourced and there was a wide variety of information from early life to family to career and other milestones. Tone: The tone was informative, unbiased, and very clear to read. Sources: There were ample resources provided, a good array of information, and came from reputable sources. Organization and writing quality: The writing was very well done, information was structured clearly and in a logical manner. It was very easy to follow and understand. Images and media: We wish there had been an image included! Talk page: Not much here! It looks like only one person worked on the page. Overall impressions: Great page, really enjoyed evaluating it.