User:Asof100/sandbox

Article Evaluation
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * The article is well written and everything is relevant to the history of Rutgers however it is not very lengthy and could has some important historical information missing.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is very pro Rutgers, it is hard to find anything bad about the university in the article.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There is zero representation of the history of Rutgers that we are learning about in this class. No where in the article does it mention slavery or the displacement of Native Americans
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Some of the links are older and you have to click on a new link to get to the information. The sources do seem to support what is presented in the article
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Most of the information comes either from websites or books from Rutgers University itself, while there may not be a clear bias to see, I feel like the bias is in the information that is left out which is very important to the history of Rutgers.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * On the top of the page there is a message stating "This article needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information" and that was written in July 2013. Most of the information from the sources was accessed in 2006 so the whole issue of slavery and Rutgers is missing and should be added.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * The entire history of how Rutgers was built through slavery and displacement does not show up at all. The fact that most of the people that funded Rutgers were slaveowners is not shown. Pretty much all the of the information from Scarlet and Black is missing.