User:AspLILLY/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Social science
 * I have chosen to evaluate this article because I am interested in social science and the theory of sociology known as conflict theory.

Lead

 * Guiding questions

This article provides a concise and informative introduction to the topic. Within the Lead paragraph, the topics (major sections) that are covered later in the article are effectively introduced. Everything introduced in the Lead is further explored later in the article.

Lead evaluation
Overall, the Lead is concise, clear and provides necessary detail.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * The article covers a variety of sub-topics that are relevant to the topic of Social Science. This page provides an overview of the various sub-topics and sub-themes related to Social Sciences.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * The article is neutral and presents information objectively.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * This page includes numerous links and citations. The references and bibliography sections are thoroughly developed and provide extensively as to where the information was sources from.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * This article is well-written, it is insightful and effectively introduces the reader to the topic of Social Sciences.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Many of the images included in this article are of famous people linked to Social Sciences. I think images could be added to depict various Social Sciences concepts rather than just showing pictures of famous people, particularly in the methodology and theories sections.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions
 * Various individuals brought up areas in which they think further detail is needed. A few people added and edited external links that are embedded within the article. Multiple users engaged in discussions around the possibility of merging the Social Science article with the Human Sciences article. However, their decision on this matter is not included on the Talk Page, but seeing that the page still exists, I would assume that it was decided to keep the Social Sciences page active and separate from Human Sciences.

Talk page evaluation

 * There have been many discussions on the Talk page, and this page continues to be active. The last post was made on September 8, 2020.

Overall evaluation

 * This is an informative article that includes insightful details to educate the reader on the topic.