User:AsteforiiAlbicans/Introgression/Sydneyglouse Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:AsteforiiAlbicans


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AsteforiiAlbicans/Introgression
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I really like how you integrated your work with the original work. I referenced the original article and saw where the plagiarism was present. I think the first section and the definition section are a bit redundant, so maybe you could put what you added to the definition section to the first section?

-In the first section where you added a good bit of information, there is not any references. I would added references to ensure no plagiarism.

-I think the images really tie your information together and visually represents what the article is talking about. One suggestion, could you refer to the images in your text? Like an in text citation for your figure? That way whoever reads the article can read a sentence then refer to the figure for further visual representation?

-All the sources you used are reliable and thorough.

- The writing is concise, clear, and easy to read

- The added images enhance the understanding of the topic, very well done

-The content added improved the overall quality of the article--not sure if you would want to add a conclusion section? I know sometimes when I read articles I like to read the conclusion because it helps me really grasp the idea at the end of the article.

Good job! This was nicely done!

Sydneyglouse (talk) 18:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)