User:Astrahiraeth/Mycena manipularis/Buginarug11 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * - Astrahiraeth
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Astrahiraeth/Mycena_manipularis?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * - Mycena manipularis

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The article has been updated to reflect the new content added. The introductory sentence is clear and concise. The lead does not contain a sentence that summarizes the major sections of the article. The lead does not include information that is not mentioned elsewhere in the article.The lead is concise.

Content

The content added is relevant to the topic. All the content is up to date and relevant. Sections were added in that now fill the gaps that the previous article had. The article does fill equity gaps and there is a diverse group of authors.

Tone and Balance

The content added is neutral. There is no bias or overepresentated or underrepresented viewpoints.

Sources

All of the content is backed up by information. the sources are thorough and reliable. The sources are current and diverse. The links are all working.

Organization

It is concise clear and easy to read. It needs to be transfered to sentence and paragraph format. I am not aware of any grammar or spelling errors. The content is well layed out in its sections.

Images and Media

The previous article has some images but it was mentioned in our discussion that there will be more images added that show the bioluminescence of the mycena manipularis.

Overall Impression

This is a good article basis. Most of the points just need to be put into sentence formatting and you will have a strong article improvement.