User:AstroWiki143/History of neuroimaging/18roo Peer Review

Mute this user

General info
AstroWiki143
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AstroWiki143/History of neuroimaging
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
I believe the structure of the article is organized and on topic. The content seems up to date and relative to the topic discussed. Through the article the position of the authors seemed to stay neutral. I like how the authors included images that go along with the sections being talked about, or the people brought up. The images are all well captioned telling the reader in a precise way what is happening in the photo. The images also seem to follow the rules of Wikipedia's copyright. All the sources seem to uphold the standards Wikipedia has for their articles, and they all seem to actually pop up when clicked on. I find the sources page to be neat and organized. However, I feel some of the sections could have expanded their information a little more, or added at least another picture for some of the sections to show more specific examples. Other than that I feel this article looks put together and it has a nice flow.