User:AstroWiki143/History of neuroimaging/Soccernumber1 Peer Review

General info
AstroWiki143 User:AstroWiki143/History of neuroimaging
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? They provided an overview of their issue and what it entails when the reader first reads the post. Eased understanding of the topic and made it simple to grasp.


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? They made it simple to understand each topic and how they were going to cover it in brief throughout the article. This helped me grasp their intended message, which was made clear by the way each topic was explained and divided into smaller sections.

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Since they go into further detail to describe the entire process and provide a variety of references throughout their study, a large portion of their material appears to be relevant to their subject.  They clearly explain how these scans were created, how they are being used, and how they have developed as they cover a wide range of topics in their study.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Given the dates shown here and the number of references that have been posted, I believe their information is current.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? In my opinion, the researchers in this study have been very impartial and have attempted to provide as much information as possible regarding the process of creating scans and their evolution over time. This is in contrast to most other forms of formation, which are more theoretical and not grounded in reality.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? One viewpoint that was arguably underrepresented was their simple explanation of how they can see inside the brain or arm during these kinds of scans. By providing more information on these kinds of topics, they seemed to make us more interesting because we were able to connect with them.

Sources and References


 * Are the sources current? They cite a few sources that date back to 2011, but since technology has advanced significantly in recent years, there may be a significant difference in those sources. It's also possible that they obtained information from a scanner that was in use at the time and needed further clarification on how specific things functioned as scanners became more common and released more frequently.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? They did use those references to obtain material for their piece, and from what I could see browsing their websites, many of them are trustworthy and appear to be current.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? I found it easy to understand their layout and to grasp the information they were discussing when I first skimmed through it quickly. They are very neat and organized on each topic, making it simple for me to find exactly what I'm looking for and easy to understand what they are talking about. As I read through their material more carefully, I gained a better understanding of the topics they were discussing throughout the article as well as how the scanners have evolved and what each one did.

Overall impressions


 * What are the strengths of the content added? Their strength, in my opinion, is simply keeping things straightforward and easy to understand, which is something I really give to them. They also only provide the appropriate amount of justification, aren't overly long, and even add a little bit of information—you might be a little left off of some questions when reading—while still making everything easy to read and comprehend in the end.  I think they're just giving it a nicer appearance by making the subject seem simple to comprehend rather than making it complicated or overthinking it.

Additional Questions


 * No questions from me just stick to keeping it simple and easy to understand is really the key to your guys work.

-Yadira