User:Astrosfan1212/Expert witness/Borchersg1 Peer Review

Overall the article summary explains the topic well with many references to the value of expert witnesses and the potential controversies they can be involved in. I find the fact regarding an expert witness having glasses or a briefcase making them more trustworthy especially interesting. Based on how the article is structured I assume that there are sources however, there are no sources present in the article at the moment so I am unable to review them and determine their credibility. Apart from the lack of sources, the article looks like it is on a good track. The lead section could be clarified a little more as currently it lists many intriguing facts but is somewhat random in its structuring. Other than that, the article looks in good shape!

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)