User:At00naSammich/History of the location of the soul/Lavie123 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Aarongg20, At00naSammich
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: History of the location of the soul

Lead
Lead evaluation


 * The Lead has been updated to reflect the new content added by the author.
 * The Lead include an introductory sentence that is concisely describes the article's topic.
 * The Lead included a brief description of the article's major sections, however, did not mention about Herophilus, Epicurus, or Plotinus.
 * The Lead did not include information that is not present in the article.
 * The Lead is overall concise.

Content
Content evaluation


 * The content added is relevant to the topic
 * The content added is up to date
 * There were no evidence of content that is missing or content that does not belong.
 * The content added had a good amount of information in some sections but lacking in some sections including a section about Epicurus.

Tone and Balance
Tone and balance evaluation


 * The content added is neutral since it is informative rather than persuasive.
 * There are not any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position
 * Some sections are underrepresented including Epicurus and Plato
 * The content added did not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another

Sources and References
Sources and references evaluation


 * The information reported are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. More sources could be used to strengthen the article.
 * The sources are fairly current.
 * The sources provided are written by a diverse spectrum of authors
 * The links provided to secondary sources are valid

Organization
Organization evaluation


 * The content added is well written and easy for audience to read.
 * The content added have minor grammatical error.
 * The content added is well organized and broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.

Images and Media
Images and media evaluation


 * The article included some visual representation of the topic that enhanced understanding of the topic
 * The images well-captioned overall
 * The images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations


 * The images incorporated are laid out in a visually appealing way.

Overall impressions
Overall evaluation


 * Overall, the content added has improved the quality of the article.