User:At2118/Mitosis/PhilanthropicOcelot Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? At2118
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Mitosis

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * The introduction is inclusive yet concise and gives an accurate overview of Mitosis and its constituent stages. It also covers the sections contained within the Wikipedia page.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * In referring to the Sandbox draft; insufficient additions have been made for assessments to be made at this point.
 * The content contained within the published article is relevant, and not overcomplicated.
 * The article does not relate to Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The article is written in a passive and unbiased tone. No bias or viewpoint is asserted.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * The content is backed by an extensive reference section. Sources are relatively current, with a few older citations that could likely be updated.


 * Some of the sources are primary literature sources; these could be replaced with review articles. This would bolster the credibility of the references in the reviewers opinion.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The article has a good flow with easy to grasp sentence structures and clear assertions.
 * No grammatical/spelling errors were found.
 * The article is well organized and covers the important aspects of mitosis.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * No added media was found in the sandbox; however the article itself is rich in illustrative figures and images of mitosis. These images add to the understanding and complement the content of the article.


 * Figures contained within the article are fair use under some creative commons license; or have proper attribution.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * The article contains helpful hyperlinks to other Wikipedia pages associated with mitosis

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Unfortunately no conclusions on the overall additions to the article can be made due to lack of content in the sandbox.
 * One suggestion would be to replace the primary literature citations with review article citations. Some attention can also be payed to updating older citations with newer and more recent reviews or secondary sources.
 * I have no doubt that my classmate will be able to make a beneficial contribution to the article.