User:Atallent/Being Digital/Kaitlyn.Kelly Peer Review

Peer review
.

General info
Here, I will be reviewing the article Being Digital.

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * As I've viewed the history by my classmate on this article, I've only seen where grammatical errors have been fixed. However, I haven't seen any major contributions to the lead that have been updated by my classmates.
 * The lead consists of an introductory sentence that describes Being Digital, what it is, who wrote it, and a brief history of it.
 * The lead in this article includes a description of the article major sections such as "Bits and atoms", Negroponte Switch", etc.
 * The lead does not include any information that's not present in the article.
 * The lead is concise and does not include any additional information. The amount of information in the lead is appropriate and is not too little or too much.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * The content in the article is relevant to the topic.
 * The content is up to date.
 * There is no information in the article that doesn't belong. However, I do think that it would be good to go a bit more into detail about what Negroponte means by "being digital" and also about how he expresses that the "medium is not the message".

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * There hasn't been any content that's been added to the actual article except for gramatical changes.
 * There are not any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * There aren't any viewpoints that are overrepresented underrepresented in this article.
 * The content in this article doesn't attempt to persuade readers in anyway. Everything is factual.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Overall, the content is well written. It's easy to read and comprehend and is organized well.
 * The article has a few grammatical errors however, my classmates have already resolved those issues.
 * The content is well organized and is separated into multiple sections that reflect some of the key points of Negroponete's book.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Images in the article include a photo of the book. This photo does not enhance the understanding of the topic, however it still serves the purpose of allowing the reader to know what the book looks like.
 * The image of the book cover is titled correctly.
 * All images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.
 * The image is placed to the far right of the article. It's not in the way and it doesn't take away from the content of the article.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The content that's been added to this article includes spelling and grammatical errors and has imporved the article.
 * Some of the strengths of the content added include the correct spelling of words so that the article can be read easily.
 * As mentioned previously, this article can be improved ny going a bit more into detail about what Negroponte means by "being digital" and also what he means by "the medium is not the message"

Overall evaluation
Overall, this article is well written and organized very well. I think that it would be worth adding some more content regarding the "being digital" and "the medium is not the message" phrase.