User:Ath28/sandbox

Notes: Evaluating Wikipedia
 * "Start" or "Stub" class articles aren't considered as reliable, or simply don't provide a very strong overview of the topic. These are great articles to evaluate and edit.fac
 * Qualities of Strong Articles:
 * Clear overview
 * Clear structure with several headings and subheadings, arranged chronologically or by theme
 * Balanced, neutral coverage.
 * Reliable sources cited throughout the article
 * Signs of a Weak Article:
 * Warning banners
 * Language and grammar issues
 * Few references, or references to unnamed sources.
 * Unequal length of otherwise equally relevant sections
 * Editors can challenge unreferenced statements by adding a tag
 * Should be citing at least once per paragraph, but quotations, hard facts, and controversial claims must always be cited.
 * Information on Wikipedia must:
 * Come from independent sources
 * Come from sources known for fact-checking and neutrality
 * Come from reliable publishers and represent a general consensus in the field.
 * Poor sources include: Blog posts and social media, press releases and promotional material, official websites, and self-published materials.
 * Be careful to avoid copyright infringement
 * To add a citation:
 * Check that the bottom of the page has a "Notes" or "References" section. If not, type: .
 * Check that the Notes section either has the text   or  . If not, type: .
 * Click after the text you would like to create a reference for
 * Type in the   tag before the reference and type   after the reference.
 * The "View History" page displays a list of recent changes to an article, with comments regarding what other editors have altered.