User:Atharvawadodkar/Coral reef restoration/Eeclem Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing the article titled 'Coral reef restoration' which is being worked on by: @atharvawadodkar


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * The draft I am reviewing can be found here.
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The current version of this article can be found here.
 * The current version of this article can be found here.

Lead Section
This user has not contributed to the lead section of this article. As such, my comments here are irrelevant.

Content
The content is relevant and up-to-date and doesn't seem to bias any particular position.

I appreciated how this user discusses the impact of developing countries vs. developed countries on coral reefs due to greenhouse gas emissions. The user discusses how, although developed countries emit more greenhouse gases, developing countries are impacted by the consequences of this much more. I think this equity gap is really important to discuss in this context, so I appreciated that it was included.

Tone and Balance
The content is neutral and unbiased. When I was reading it, I didn't feel as though I was being persuaded towards any specific point of view or opinion.

Sources and References
This is the biggest problem area for this article addition. Although there are four referenced sources in the reference section, they are only used three times total in the article, with many claims being left without any citation.

Organization
This article addition could benefit from a quick edit for minor grammatical and spelling errors. Otherwise, it is well organized and clearly indicates what sections of the article are being expanded on.

Images and Media
The inclusion of the image of a coral polyp was successfully referenced and provides good visual context for the reader.

Overall, the additions to this article are well written and relevant to the topic of coral reef restoration. However, in order for this article addition to truly succeed in significantly improving the preexisting article, it requires further in-text citations.