User:Atnelson09/Nick Mira/12willow34 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Atnelson09


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atnelson09/Nick_Mira?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nick Mira

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I like how you included a personal quote from Mira that talks about a software that is very popular. I was wondering where you would plan to fit this quote in, since I do not think it would work well in the career section; however, if Mira himself uses this software, then I think it could have a place in the career section.

Your sources appear to be notable and reliable, since they are both from Genius.com, a very well known source. The links work, are relatively current, and are cited properly. I would suggest adding something from another website, just so you are not relying too heavily on Genius.com as your only source (although I know it is difficult to find more reliable sources, so just take that with a grain of salt).

The addition of an album Mira worked on in 2020 was great, and definitely added valuable information to the career section of the article. The linking of other associated artists is great, and maybe the non-existent article for TyFontaine will prompt someone else to write about him, too. Here, I suggest adding a different source for the Billboard fact, so you can lend the fact some credibility and potentially use that to find another source as well.

What you have written so far looks neutral and grammatically correct, which is great. To reiterate, my main suggestions would be to add another, non Genius.com source, consider the necessity of the software comment, and adding a source for the Billboard fact. Great work so far!