User:Auburnen/Cater Hall/Aubiethetiger04 Peer Review

General info
User: Auburnnen
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Auburnen/Cater Hall
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cater Hall
 * Cater Hall

The Lead
The introduction is similar to the original article. I like how the author used the original article content for their lead. A suggestion for the lead can involve the author adding a sentence that explains the additional sections they are covering in the article. Overall, the lead is concise and straight to the point. Great job!

Content
I enjoy the author's new additions to the Cater Hall article. I like how the author explained the building's dedication and women's rights history. I do not have any critiques to add for content; as long as it is cohesive with the article, the author is in good standing.

Tone and Balance
The content maintains a neutral tone. A suggestion for the Dean Katherine Cooper Cater section can be making a clear distinction between the quote and other paragraphs in the section. The author can possibly have the last two sentences of the section be a standalone paragraph.

Sources and References
The selected sources are valid. Author has taken great care in selecting reputable sources. The sources are also mostly current and up to date. I like how the Honor's College Website is used for information. Make sure that your last source is properly cited. Source #4 appears as the AU Library login.

Organization
Content is well organized. Before publication, a suggestion can be proofreading for any grammatical errors.

Images/Media
N/A

** Overall, I enjoyed reading the revisions to the Cater Hall article. Keep up the good work!**