User:Audicm/Color psychology/Vre99 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Audicm


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Audicm/Color_psychology?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Color psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
'''When I clicked on the sandbox draft page for this user, I did not see any information for me to peer review. I read the article, and I think more information should be added to the placebo effect section. This section seemed pretty bare when looking at the article in its entirety. Why does the color of the pill have any effect on the effectiveness? If this is more dependent on culture or patient expectation then should this section even be included in this article? I also feel like the blue public lighting section just seems to give us a fact without providing anymore context. It begs for more information. If using blue public lighting does help with lowering suicide rates, could we get more information on how this works? So that the reader can see if this is a subtopic they are interested in and could conduct more research if they wanted to? I think this article provides a lot of information about branding and marketing, as well as individual differences in color meanings. I would personally not add more to either of these sections, but add more to the placebo effect (unless it is determined that this section does not enhance this article, then I would personally remove it and add that information to an article about placebo effects) and blue public lighting sections. I also noticed that game immersion section at the end was only a few sentences. This section could probably benefit from more information being added, however I do think this section was summed up quite nicely. Overall, this article is really interesting. There are a few places where I feel it would be relatively easy to add more information and enhance this article!'''