User:Audlz/Chen Mingxia (1940-Present)/Borna Haghighat Peer Review

General info
Audlz
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Doesn't exist
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Audlz/Chen Mingxia (1940-Present):
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead
The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes Chen Mingxia. The lead includes a description of most of the sections in the article. However, it does not talk about the last section "Books Written or Co-Authored by Chen Mingxi", which should be added. Also, the lead makes note of Chen Mingxia fighting domestic violence numerous times but does not talk about her work in the gender equality space which is a section in the article.

Content
The content added is relevant to the topic and it is up to date. The article also addresses one of Wikipedia' equity gaps by addressing a feminist and advocate for women which is a historically underrepresented topic. I found the content to be very insightful because not only did they go in depth about the work that Chen Mingxia preformed but they also made sure sure to talk multiple different aspects of Chen Mingxia's activism. The article does not just focus on one point. With this being said, I think in some cases some more description could be added in order to provide more context for the reader. For example, in the "General Work in the Gender Equality Space" it talks about how Chen Mingxia worked with the All-China Women’s Federation but it does not describe what this organization was or did. In addition, I would add a hyperlink to the All-China Women’s Federation wikipedia page, so that readers can be led to federations page and learn more about it. Overall, I found the content of article to be very informative and was able to learn a lot about Chen Mingxia.

Tone and Balance
The article content is neutral and does not have any claims that are heavily biased. In addition, the content does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References
The content is backed up by reliable secondary sources. In addition, the content accurately reflects what is in the the cited sources. Majority of the sources cited are current because most of them are from the last 15 years or so. One critique is that the sources are not written by a diverse spectrum of authors. There are only 5 sources cited and while this fine, three of the sources are by the same author. This can lead to some voices and all viewpoints to not be heard. Lastly, the links do work.

Organization
The content is well written, concise, clear, and easy to read. The content did not have any grammatical or spelling errors that I noticed. The content was organized well because it is broken down in various sections that describe the different aspect of Chen Mingxia's life, work, and activism.

Images and Media
The article does not have any images but I think an image of Chen Mingxia would not only make the article look better but also give the reader a visual representation of who the article is talking about.

New Article
The article meets all the necessary requirements but could use more diverse sources if available. Article follows the pattern of similar articles through the use of a lead and headings. Also, there are links to other articles.

Overall Impressions
Overall, the article was very well written and I learned a lot about Chen Mingxia. The article has a strong lead and good content. The organization of the article is also very good because it makes use of headings. The article is not biased and every statement is backed up by a source. The article meets all of the requirements. The only critiques would be to add an image and make use of more diverse sources.