User:Aumgirl2024/Queen Naija/Aumgirl2024 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Queen Naija


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Queen Naija

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * The lead does include an introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic.
 * The lead includes sentences that briefly describe he article's main sections.
 * The lead includes that three of Queen Naija's singles were all certified platinum by the RIAA, but doesn't mention it in the article.
 * Yes: it's in the discography.
 * I feel that the lead may be a bit overly detailed. Maybe the second paragraph could've been left off.
 * For a musical artist it's not too detailed--but why was her ex-husband in the lead? I tweaked it a bit.

Content


 * The content added to the article is relevant to the topic.
 * The content added is up-to-date, as it mentions her latest album.
 * There isn't any content that doesn't belong.
 * The article doesn't address topics related to historically underrepresented topics/populations.

Tone and Balance


 * The content is neutral
 * There are no claims that appear to be biased.
 * There are no overrepresented/underrepresented viewpoints.
 * The content doesn't attempt to persuade the reader.

Sources and References


 * Sources provided are majority of Twitter ,YouTube, and billboard links. Many of the links aren't available, and there are lots of links that are just links to her singles on Apple Music.
 * It's difficult to tell whether some of the sources actually reflect what the article says since most of the links are YouTube videos with no specific time stamp, and some aren't available. However, the Billboard links accurately reflect what the article says.
 * Right--and in most cases YouTube links are not acceptable. There are more problematic ones: Genius is user-submitted, and thus not acceptable. There was a tweet. I made a rather serious edit to the article, removing much of that material and its sources.
 * Some of the sources are as current as 2020
 * The sources do not include any historically marginalized individuals.
 * Other sources available include interviews and are mainly published in magazine articles

Organization


 * The article is clear and easy to read
 * Content doesn't have any spelling/grammatical errors.
 * The article is well-organized and broken into the sections that reflect the major points of the article.

Images and Media


 * The article includes only one imagine. The image is of Queen Naija, and it isn't captioned.
 * The image adheres to copyright regulations.
 * I think the image is shown in a visually appealing way.

Overall Impressions


 * Overall, the article is good.
 * I would say that the strengths of the article are the organization of the sections and the lead.
 * I think that the content can be improved by adding more reliable sources other than Twitter and YouTube links.
 * Yes. That is the problem here.