User:Aurebal/Women's Environment & Development Organization/Skyyron Peer Review

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? I do believe you added a lot of good content that adds valuable information to the establishments of Womens Environments & Development Organization
 * What are the strengths of the content added? More specifically, I believe you've added really great sources as well as elaborated so much more on what WEDO is. Before, the first person to write this only used WEDO which admittedly a little less professional looking and you added more of an educational look to it. This is not even mentioning the length either. Youve added a lot of really great things to this wiki article.
 * How can the content added be improved? I would say that there might be able to be more elaboration on the subdivisions within WEDO. Possibly add subcategories. I believe this is a pretty good start.

Overall evaluation
I think that what you've added has made this article more full and overall added more than took away. Originally, there was little to no information within the description of WEDO and it looked rather bad in terms of the way it was written.Yes, there is room for growth in this new writing, but its started in a good place. The sources are extremely reliable, there are a ton of them, and they're relative. Plus they cover a wide variety of topics involving this as a description of this topic.