User:Aurelianoscuriti/sandbox

= Presemiotic theory in the works of Fellini = Text generated from the Postmodernism Generator located here

1. Fellini and structuralist narrative
“Sexual identity is part of the failure of truth,” says Lacan; however,

according to Sargeant[1 ], it is not so much sexual identity

that is part of the failure of truth, but rather the rubicon of sexual

identity. The subject is interpolated into a neocultural libertarianism that

includes reality as a paradox.

The primary theme of Reicher’s[2 ] analysis of dialectic

discourse is the bridge between narrativity and society. In a sense, in

Melrose Place, Spelling affirms the subcapitalist paradigm of consensus;

in Charmed, however, he examines presemiotic theory. If structuralist

narrative holds, we have to choose between dialectic discourse and dialectic

posttextual theory.

If one examines semanticist situationism, one is faced with a choice: either

accept presemiotic theory or conclude that culture serves to disempower

minorities. However, Baudrillard’s critique of the subcultural paradigm of

narrative holds that the law is a legal fiction. Bailey[3 ]

suggests that the works of Spelling are reminiscent of Rushdie.

The characteristic theme of the works of Spelling is the collapse, and

subsequent dialectic, of poststructuralist language. In a sense, Lyotard

promotes the use of presemiotic theory to challenge sexual identity. The genre,

and eventually the failure, of dialectic discourse prevalent in Spelling’s

The Heights emerges again in Beverly Hills 90210.

“Culture is intrinsically dead,” says Lacan. However, if presemiotic theory

holds, we have to choose between cultural premodernist theory and cultural

theory. The primary theme of Long’s[4 ] analysis of dialectic

discourse is not, in fact, narrative, but prenarrative.

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the distinction between

within and without. In a sense, textual appropriation states that sexuality is

used to reinforce sexist perceptions of class, given that Marx’s essay on

structuralist narrative is valid. The main theme of the works of Spelling is

the role of the observer as participant.

The characteristic theme of Finnis’s[5 ] model of

neopatriarchial Marxism is not dematerialism per se, but postdematerialism.

Therefore, Debord suggests the use of presemiotic theory to deconstruct class

divisions. The premise of structuralist narrative implies that narrativity is

capable of significance.

In a sense, the main theme of the works of Stone is the paradigm of textual

society. Sartre’s essay on neocapitalist constructivism states that academe is

part of the futility of culture.

But Marx promotes the use of presemiotic theory to analyse and attack class.

Dialectic discourse suggests that sexual identity, somewhat ironically, has

significance.

It could be said that Lacan uses the term ‘structuralist narrative’ to

denote the common ground between society and sexual identity. Sartre suggests

the use of the textual paradigm of expression to deconstruct hierarchy.

However, many narratives concerning the role of the writer as reader exist.

In Natural Born Killers, Stone reiterates dialectic discourse; in

Platoon, although, he analyses presemiotic theory.

It could be said that d’Erlette[6 ] states that we have to

choose between dialectic discourse and cultural posttextual theory. Any number

of theories concerning presemiotic theory may be revealed.

Therefore, the premise of structuralist narrative suggests that context

comes from the collective unconscious, but only if sexuality is equal to art;

otherwise, we can assume that consciousness may be used to oppress the Other.

Several constructions concerning the bridge between reality and sexual identity

exist.

It could be said that Baudrillard promotes the use of dialectic discourse to

read culture. Lyotard uses the term ‘structuralist narrative’ to denote the

role of the writer as observer.

Thus, the feminine/masculine distinction which is a central theme of Stone’s

Heaven and Earth is also evident in Platoon, although in a more

mythopoetical sense. Dialectic discourse holds that reality is capable of

truth, given that the premise of presemiotic theory is invalid.

It could be said that any number of theories concerning structuralist

narrative may be found. Debord’s analysis of presemiotic theory suggests that

society has intrinsic meaning.

2. Dialectic discourse and cultural discourse
If one examines presemiotic theory, one is faced with a choice: either

reject dialectic discourse or conclude that expression must come from the

masses. However, if Foucaultist power relations holds, we have to choose

between cultural discourse and pretextual narrative. Bataille suggests the use

of presemiotic theory to challenge the status quo.

But the subject is contextualised into a dialectic discourse that includes

consciousness as a totality. Cultural discourse holds that language is used to

entrench hierarchy.

Thus, Geoffrey[7 ] implies that we have to choose between

presemiotic theory and cultural postdialectic theory. Derrida’s essay on

Batailleist `powerful communication’ states that the goal of the participant is

social comment, given that truth is distinct from narrativity.

3. Contexts of stasis
In the works of Stone, a predominant concept is the concept of textual

reality. In a sense, Baudrillard uses the term ‘cultural discourse’ to denote a

self-fulfilling whole. Many discourses concerning the role of the poet as

artist exist.

If one examines presemiotic theory, one is faced with a choice: either

accept dialectic discourse or conclude that discourse is created by the

collective unconscious. Thus, if subdeconstructive Marxism holds, we have to

choose between cultural discourse and textual precultural theory. Bataille

promotes the use of dialectic theory to attack and modify language.

Therefore, the primary theme of Pickett’s[8 ] analysis of

dialectic discourse is the meaninglessness, and some would say the dialectic,

of subcultural society. Several sublimations concerning cultural discourse may

be revealed.

But the premise of dialectic discourse implies that art may be used to

exploit the underprivileged, but only if presemiotic theory is valid; if that

is not the case, Sontag’s model of cultural discourse is one of “the capitalist

paradigm of consensus”, and hence fundamentally used in the service of

capitalism. In Ulysses, Joyce denies dialectic discourse; in

Finnegan’s Wake, however, he affirms cultural discourse.

Therefore, the premise of dialectic discourse suggests that class,

surprisingly, has objective value. Von Junz[9 ] states that

we have to choose between patriarchialist capitalism and the predialectic

paradigm of expression.

4. Joyce and cultural discourse
In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the distinction between

closing and opening. Thus, Bataille suggests the use of presemiotic theory to

deconstruct class divisions. The main theme of the works of Joyce is a

mythopoetical totality.

“Culture is a legal fiction,” says Derrida; however, according to Bailey[10 ], it is not so much culture that is a legal fiction, but

rather the absurdity of culture. In a sense, cultural discourse suggests that

the law is part of the meaninglessness of reality. The defining characteristic,

and eventually the meaninglessness, of presemiotic theory intrinsic to Joyce’s

A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man emerges again in

Dubliners.

However, the subject is interpolated into a cultural discourse that includes

culture as a paradox. The characteristic theme of Hubbard’s[11 ] essay on presemiotic theory is the role of the poet as

participant.

In a sense, if dialectic discourse holds, we have to choose between

presemiotic theory and cultural nationalism. An abundance of narratives

concerning the difference between class and sexual identity exist.

Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a Foucaultist power relations

that includes narrativity as a whole. The main theme of the works of Eco is a

predialectic reality.

It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a cultural discourse

that includes consciousness as a totality. Many discourses concerning

presemiotic theory may be found.

The chicken or the egg
Wing

Chicken
Chickens can slightly fly