User:AustinePeng/Outreach/Isabelleosorio Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username): AustinePeng
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AustinePeng/Outreach/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? For the "Homeless Street Outreach" section, I think that the "Territory" subsection is a bit long and can be merged with the overview. I think it would be helpful to add short subsections or bullets that define the other models (very briefly, like 1-2 sentences).
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The emphasis on the Housing First Model maybe? (See Content)
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? It seems like it!
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Overall yes. I think some lines lean towards a bit wordy (lines with a lot of conjunctions or commas), but overall easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No. I did notice that the phrase in "Categories" after "satellite outreach" wasn't in parentheses unlike the previous items in the list -- not sure if this was intentional.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes! Way more complete.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? I think that the content is organized and provides a strong definition and segmentation of outreach. If I was trying to learn about different types of outreach, I think this article is a great introduction to a bunch of keywords in this space.
 * How can the content added be improved? Since it's heavily focused on Housing/the Housing First Model, I think a few more definitions can be provided in addition to the Housing First Model.