User:AustinePeng/People's Park (Berkeley)/Isabelleosorio Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) AustinePeng
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AustinePeng/People's_Park_(Berkeley)/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes. Super up-to-date, it even includes COVID-19.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I think that the quote from the Berkeley mayor may not be necessary.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes. Although, I think that "the spirit of student activism has preserved through the years" is not neutral and probably even untrue (lol).
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes. Great writing!
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes. "In February 2020, the University held it's ".
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes. I think the length of each paragraph (in the new content) is perfect.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes. It's super updated and accounts for COVID-19 in new developments.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The content is well written and at perfect length proportional to the rest of the article.
 * How can the content added be improved? Not much to say here! Know the difference between "it's" and "its" I guess.