User:Austinh291/Video game live streaming/LNeiswonger224 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Austinh291
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * https://niagara.instructure.com/courses/15409/assignments/164639/anonymous_submissions/1kQDT?download=961114
 * Video game live streaming

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Austinh291 has not updated the lead yet.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * I do think that the lead is concise and clear. The introductory sentence clearly defines what streamers are; which is a a concept a reader would need to understand before trying to comprehend the article. Also, it describes some of the most popular websites that streaming is found on.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The lead does not include a description of the article's major sections. The overview, profession, risks and legal issues were not mentioned.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Nothing in the lead was not presented later in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * I would say that the lead is concise. It goes over some popular websites that stream as well as defining the basic concepts of what video streaming is.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Austinh291 has not added any information to the topic yet.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * I would say that the content in the article is pretty up to date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I do not think any content is missing from the article. However, maybe there could be a section on the health benefits and health problems related to video game streaming.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Austinh291 has not added and content to the article yet. But, the overall tone of the article does seem to be written from a neutral standpoint.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * I could not find any claims that appeared heavily biased in the article.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I think that nothing in the article was over-represented. However, I think that the kind of cameras the streamers use and the types of gear for live streaming was under-represented in the article.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No content was added to the article yet. But the article seemed to be written from a unbiased standpoint.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * There has been no new content added by Austinh291. However, in the article itself not every sentence has been cited.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * The sources of the article are thorough and seem to be overall relevant to the topic.
 * Are the sources current?
 * The sources are current some of the older sources go back to 2013.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, the links I tried did work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * There has not been any content added by my peer. on the article itself. He just wrote his plans for the article near the bottom of the page.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No new content has been added by the user. But, his ideas are grammatically correct and the article seems to be written well.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * My peer has not added new content to the article. The original article was well organized with each section broken down to sections that go over the main points.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * There is only one image in the entire article. And it is just the logo of Twitch. It does not really enhance the reader's overall understanding of the topic.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * The one image is well captioned because it says what he logo is.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes, it is available in the public domain, It is free from copyright restrictions.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * The images are not laid out in a visually apealling way.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * No content has been added to the article yet. However, his ideas would make the article seem more complete.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The content he is thinking of adding will give readers more of a understanding about how to become a streamer for a future career path.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * I think my peer should also add a section on health risks.

Overall evaluation
I think the original article is a good starting point because it has the overall main topics that relate to the subject. Also, the subjects he plans to make to the article would enhance the reader's understanding.