User:Austinx1997/sandbox

Notes: Missing from current article (BioEthics)

Intro: Missing some information. Probably want to add more of a descriptive term to what bio ethics exactly is. Could add more of a psychological perspective as well as a moral perspective. The topic is hard to explain since you can not be biased since there is no right or wrong. Right or wrong is decided based on the individual person's belief

Purpose & Scope: Explain more of the individual perspective that it is different for people because of either their culture or their religion.

Perspective: Have more explanations based on the different perspectives of religions and cultures. Rather than one sentence, probably write more of an explanation for each to allow readers to understand each perspective.

Existing definition of Bioethics is solid, however it could be made to be more specific.You should definitely add more of a psychological and moral perspective as you mentioned. In Purpose and Scope, as you said, it should be noted that different viewpoints influence perspective, and you should talk about which perspectives exist due to different moral codes and religions. The viewpoints definitely need some elaboration. Maybe talk about landmark cases or make reference to popular Bioethics happenings. Grammar is good on the article so far. Jadcruz (talk) 08:41, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Good insight on why this topic is complex to write on this topic. i think one way to counter this is by using examples of conflicts that have happened in the past. that way, you have an opportunity to present the contrasting ideas from both sides. I agree that an in depth explanation on why certain groups believe in certain morals on these topics can be helpful to the readers ~