User:Ava's Avenue/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

'' It was a pretty decent article with minimal issues. The subject is interesting and seems to often have a lot of misinformation around the topic. My impression is that the article has been edited many times but still requires support before it could be "perfect". This shows how sometimes it's the little things that can make or break the spread of misinformation. ~ ''

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

'' The structure of the article is pretty good. I didn't find anything wrong with the lead. It could use a section of when the cuisine changed after the Spanish conquered the Aztecs. There is a lot in the article and the sources seem fairly decent although they need more reliable secondary sources. There is a citation concern that is at the top of the article to let the reader know there is a citation error. I didn't see any primary sources in the source section though they quote a primary source. The historian references seem pretty diverse but could use more to back up their claims. One of the images on the page is claimed to be incorrect, the woman harvesting towards the end doesn't match the description as to what she is doing. Pictures of recreated meals would be very useful on this page. The talk page mentions most of my concerns that I listed though nothing has been changed recently. The article is pretty strong it just needs some finishing touches. The sources and citations are the main issues with this article and once fixed and thoroughly double checked the article will be complete. ~ ''