User:Avenged Eightfold/Archive 9

{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; background-color: #d2e7f7; border: 1px solid #8888aa; vertical-align: top;"
 * style="width: 68%; background-color: khaki; border: 20px solid darkblue; border-right-width:20px; border-bottom-width:10px; vertical-align: top;" rowspan="3" |
 * style="width: 68%; background-color: khaki; border: 20px solid darkblue; border-right-width:20px; border-bottom-width:10px; vertical-align: top;" rowspan="3" |

User:NASCAR Fan24
Hello.About a month ago, you nominated this use for adminship, which he declined. He has since accepted my nom, and was wondering if you would like to co-nominate with me. You're free to add one in at Requests for adminship/NASCAR Fan24 if you want. If not, that's fine, just let me and him know. Wizardman 03:04, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think it's too late to do a co-nom now; you'd just be better off !voting.  N F 24 (radio me!) 13:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Typo
You have a typo on your userpage, the word "userpage" in the complaints section is misspelled "userpaage". Just thought you might want to know. 216.49.181.128 (talk) 23:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that
Accidental very sorry about that--Thevardonrushes (talk) 20:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Newsletter
I think it may need delaying again this week. News is, again, slow.  jj137  ♠ 18:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * All right, I fixed all of the moves.   jj137  ♠ 02:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Co-nom?
Would you mind if I co-nom'd you for your RFA? It would be an honor. -- Shark face  217  19:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll do it anyway. Thank you. -- Shark face  217  19:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for devandalising my user page. Meisterkoch (talk) 21:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Your RfA
Hey there. I just saw that you had withdrawn your RfA and I'd like to offer some moral support. Hopefully the fourth RfA will be the charm. =)  N F 24 (radio me!) 23:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 

has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay, that's just...
...really strange timing. I swear the barnstar you left wasn't there when I started to leave mine. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Texas Eagle
With regard to the Texas eagle and other amtrak consist Information I removed this information from all pages as it was unilaterally wrong, describing the trains in a way which was universally overspecific(Amtrak did not always, or in most cases did not even usually follow what was stated), and often blatantly wrong. The statement about the Texas Eagle consist was not only unsourced, but also entirely wrong. Amtrak consists can and do vary from day to day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.252.162.226 (talk) 01:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

More on your RfA
Don't worry about arguments about too many RfAs in too short a period of time; such arguments are frivolous and a sad representation of what RfA has become. RFA is evidence of that.

One hint of advice: You should address any non-trivial concerns that voters might have. I would have supported had you simply addressed my concern about the ambiguity of Q3. Nousernamesleft copper, not wood 01:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Re; WP: Boston Celtics
First off, Thanks for joining! I could use some help, and I know you will be helpful with all the work with WP: BOSOX. Second, go for it, (the template). -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  02:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Looks great! Should we go ahead an renominate Boston Celtics for a FA? The last time it was nominated was November 2007. -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  02:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Done. Please help by voting. -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  02:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

caution
This reinsertion of unsubstantiated, unreferenced material is in violation of WP:BLP and has been reverted. Gnangarra 08:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Boston Red Sox newsletter - January 27, 2008.
You are receiving this newsletter because you are a member of WikiProject Boston Red Sox. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. JJBot (talk) 03:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP Celtics
Yes, please get started with that. There are a lot more article to assess actually. -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  15:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok. Based on this list why don't you do the first 200 and I'll do the last. Is that Ok? -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  16:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * It looks like it definitely won't succeed. - We definitely need to expand the lead section. Try to take a shot at that. Nice new sig by the way. And the Mets got Santana, not the Sox. Oh well... -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  20:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Signature
No, I'm not using a template. Could you give me an example of what you're talking about?  jj137  (talk)  20:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, if you were wondering, I made this mistake last June when someone notified me of it. When I asked for an example, what I meant to say was where my old signature changed.    jj137   (talk)  21:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It's OK, no worries. I assume you heard Santana was traded to the Mets? :)   jj137   (talk)  21:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that wouldn't have been good. It was probably for the best Santana went to the Mets instead of the Yankees or Red Sox.   jj137   (talk)  21:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Iván Rodríguez
Pretty impressive job with this article, good luck on the nomination, cheers. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  13:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)