User:AverageEccentric/Perpetrators, victims, and bystanders/Tarabien Peer Review

Awesome planning. I think the categorizations are very strong. The references are appropriate and reliable. The Donà reference is very well placed. You illustrate deep understanding of the topic. I would recommend another pass through specifically for neutrality. Words like “obvious” perhaps can be neutralized in later drafts. That was the only instance of distraction for me. Otherwise, the engaging topic kept focus. The information seems comprehensive, there don’t seem to be gaps or missing information even in this rougher draft. The viewpoints appear balanced and rich.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)