User:AviSOCL/Cost of attendance/Krodriguez3 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? AviSOCL
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:AviSOCL/Cost of attendance

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The original article doesn't have much information, therefore it did not go in depth with sub-topics.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Pretty straight to the point.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Adding information as to what other areas that universities spend their revenue from tuition on would be interesting, and add onto why there is the continuing increase in tuition.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes, it addresses some negatives for tuition increase, but also counters it with establishing why it may be needed and where some of the money goes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, it more so seems like it's up to the reader to decide for themselves what stance to take on the issue based off of this information provided.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * More academic sources could be used, while also looking into any available studies regarding tuition increase over the years.
 * Are the sources current?
 * For the most part yes, but some more updated ones could be incorporated as well.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Links from their sources, yes, but other than that there are no other sources leading to other Wiki pages.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No, I don't believe so.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * As of right now, they are primarily working on one section centered around the rate at which tuition has been increasing and the initiative of tuition freeze, so maybe other parts of the issue will be discussed later in another sub-section for this article.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * He's not creating a new article, just adding onto an existing one. Although, the original does lack a lot as far as content, and as of right now, this person is furthering the discussion and creating a lengthy informational source for others to reference when looking into the issue.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, it is definitely giving more details so the audience has a better understanding of what's going on.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * It included a lot of factual data that supports the main claim of cost of attendance at universities becoming a bigger issue, while also including specific examples/schools to further the points being made.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * I would say to look into any policies the US has on higher education, and if there is any regulation on university pricing and how that all gets figured out. I would even compare these policies to other countries as a way to understand the significant differences, just to see how other countries are able to make their schooling much more affordable compared to the US.