User:AvonnaPollard22/Psychological impact of climate change/Positive not popular pysch Peer Review

General info
AvonnaPollard22
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AvonnaPollard22/Psychological_impact_of_climate_change?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Article

Lead

 * The lead is concise and informative. It include the necessary definitions and facts necessary to undertsand the topic at hand completely. It is not overly detailed or distracting, overall seems like a great lead.

Content

 * The added content is relevant to the topic of the article and adds value to the article overall.
 * The content is up to date and includes literature from sources published within recent years.
 * No content seems to be out of place, but I would do some more research to ensure no content is missing from the article.

Tone and Balance

 * The tone is neutral and balanced throughout the article.
 * The editor does not attempt to sway the reader to agree with one view point over another, it is balanced

Sources and References

 * The new content appears to be backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.
 * The sources included in the article appear thorough and the links worked when clicked.
 * The sources are current and included recent research