User:Awatson723/Parkinson's disease/Skycbradford Peer Review

General info
Awatson723
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Awatson723/Parkinson's disease
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Parkinson's disease

Evaluate the drafted changes
As far as the lead of the article, I don't think think it will need anything added to it. The section you chose to edit was a good choice, as it was missing some information. The information you added was clear and concise. I appreciate that the details were straight to the point. You provided relevant information to the topic, further explaining it, while making it easy to understand for someone who does not know much about it.

The tone remained neutral throughout the article, which is a huge point WikiEdu makes in training. I do not feel persuaded in any way.

I appreciate the notes at the bottom explaining each thing you added or changed, it made it very clear as to what was your own work. I have nothing negative to say about the information you added.

The citations did confuse me a little bit. I believe they are the ones in your bibliography, but I would add them to the bottom under references just to make sure you have them all together and you can add the linked citations into your work. I have found that useful in my own work. It makes it easier to go back to find an article if I need to cite it elsewhere.

For future addition ideas, I feel like adding to the classification section would be beneficial in further explaining the points it is trying to make. Not to mention, it could use another citation or two. I also noticed that the Medications as well as Society and Culture sections need an update. Some of the information and citations appear a few years outdated. This would be a great addition.

I am excited to see your final product in a few weeks!