User:Awesomeaxolotl/Pearl Sherrod/NightWolf64 Peer Review

General info
Pearl Sherrod
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Awesomeaxolotl/Pearl Sherrod
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
First off, I thoroughly enjoyed this Wikipedia entry detailing Pearl T. Sherrod. The Activism heading, as well as the related subheadings, were wonderfully done and one can really get a sense of the type of impact she had on organizations such as the TDOO and PPWA.

There were a few things I noticed that can be improved upon. Although all the information provided was relevant and enhanced the entry, numerous citations were missing. I only saw a few throughout the whole entry. I do not know which references were used so I cannot double check the work to rule out any plagiarism issues. I also noticed that Reference #2 and #3 appear to be the same. Reference #5 concerned me with being a proper secondary source because of it being an online magazine. I know we can use secondary sources from the New York Times and other related newspapers, but I do not think this will count.

Overall, great job.