User:Awyeh/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Digital health
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I am interested in how technology is able to influence healthcare, and digital health is a growing field.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There are some grammatical issues in the article, but the content is overall relevant. It could use more details around certain areas like the purpose of various domains of digital health.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Mostly - there is one that is a google book that is a written book rather than a secondary source of information.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes, most were written within the last 5-6 years.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, but one link opens into a page that is written in Chinese.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No, it could be more well-organized and separate topics more distinctly.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes, it has some errors with grammar.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, it only has one image that doesn't help my understanding of the topic.
 * Are images well-captioned? No
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are discussions on merging the "digital health" and "digital healthcare" articles and making them synonymous. There are also discussions on how to define digital health in the introduction.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is rated as Start-Class and is part of Computing, Health and fitness WikiProjects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It is more holistic and looks at the milestones/big picture rather than small details or opinions.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? In progress
 * What are the article's strengths? It describes the various areas that are subsets of digital health.
 * How can the article be improved? It could be better organized and have more content added to it about the field.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? I think it is underdeveloped and requires more edits before it is complete.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: