User:AxelR2324/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

Lead

 * Guiding questions
 * The lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article. It make sure what is environmental science.The article dose have all the information that is in the article.the lead is concise not overly detail.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions
 * The article is content to the article for the reason its tell us what is a environmental science.Like the factors of environmental science.The article content is up to date.The content that it is missing is biodiversity, ecosystem, population, earth system.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions
 * The article is neutral. There is no claim that have toward a particular biased toward other position.The viewpoint that are underrepresent was the part the geoscience it only talk about the definition and what it does.No the article didn't attempt to persuade the reader.


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions
 * All the fact in the article is backup by a reliable source.The sources are some source that are currently but there are two that it's been from the 90's.It looks like that most of the links do work.


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions
 * The article is well written like more of a clear and define.No the article have any grammatical error or spelling errors.The article is broken down into a section that reflect of the main reason why environmental science.


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions
 * The article does have image that goes well of what each section as the reader continue to read.the image is well done with a high quality pictures.The image do have a visually appealing for the reason its right next to the topic that talk about the topic.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions
 * the conversation is to talk about the is none. The article is rated as a c class the way that its have been talk about in the class is that they were none.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions
 * the article overall status is a c. the article is strength is the components that provide us.the article can be improve by the geoscience topic because it was to short and not of the information.


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: