User:Axel sauce/Western diamondback rattlesnake/NolaMo2 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Axel Sauce


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

The article does a good job of briefly describing the topic and organism.


 * 1) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?

The author could tag the citations which would improve the reliability of the statements.


 * 1) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

The author can add on to this section and also tag the citations.


 * 1) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? If so, what?

I need to add the citations to the statements just as this author.


 * 1) Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? Specifically, does the information they are adding to the article make sense where they are putting it?

The section is well organized and makes sense


 * 1) Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic?

The article’s length is just right and all the information is necessary.


 * 1) Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view?

The author does not and remains neutral in the discussion of the topic


 * 1) Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y."

No, everything seems neutral


 * 1) Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors?

The statements come from the sources in the citations section


 * 1) Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view.

Yes, only two sources are used for this small section


 * 1) Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately!

The statements are unsourced but that can be fixed by the author.